MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073556809 · doi:10.1021/ma035825i

Synthesis and Sulfonation of Poly(aryl ethers) Containing Triphenyl Methane and Tetraphenyl Methane Moieties from Isocynate-Masked Bisphenols

2004· article· en· W2073556809 on OpenAlexaff
Lingfei Wang, Yun Meng, Shuanjin Wang, Xueya Shang, L. Li, A. S. Hay

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymer chemistryCondensation polymerEthylene glycolTriphenylmethaneChemistryGlass transitionPolymerArylEtherDimethylformamideNafionOrganic chemistrySolvent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wholly aromatic poly(aryl ethers) containing triphenylmethane and tetraphenylmethane moieties were successfully synthesized by aromatic nucleophilic substituting polycondensation from masked bisphenols and decafluorobiphenyl followed by sulfonation with chlorosulfonic acid. The sulfonation took place only at the para positions on the pendant phenyl rings due to the novel biphenol structures designed. For the synthesized polymers, the sulfonation content can be easily controlled and the water-takeup can be conveniently tailored by changing the amount of sulfonation agent. These sulfonated polymers are soluble in polar organic solvents, such as NMP, dimethylacetamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide, and ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and can be readily cast into tough and smooth films from solutions. The films exhibited very high water absorption ability and superior mechanical strength. These polymers also showed high glass transition temperatures ranging from 176 to 203 °C compared with Nafion. The sulfonated polymers can be potentially used as the proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207