Numerical analysis of sleeve monopole in parallel-plate waveguide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A monopole with double sleeves, which consists of a resonant loading and a conventional sleeve monopole, is experimentally investigated. The loaded monopole is put vertically in a parallel-plate waveguide and driven by a coaxial feeder. The new structure exhibits a remarkably broad impedance bandwidth. In this paper, a modal expansion technique is used to numerically evaluate the impedance characteristics of the monopole by modeling the fields between the plates using cylindrical harmonic functions. A Fourier least-square integration is applied to finding the expansion coefficients by the boundary and continuity conditions. Prior to modeling the proposed sleeve monopole, the developed analysis scheme is examined for its convergence and accuracy. Calculated results are validated by the measurements. For the optimum design at 5.8 Ghz, we investigate the effects of the structure parameters on the impedance characteristics. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J RF and Microwave CAE 11: 86–98, 2001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".