MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073623000 · doi:10.1111/maps.12323

Fall, recovery, and characterization of the Novato L6 chondrite breccia

2014· article· en· W2073623000 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Jenniskens, Alan E. Rubin, Qing‐Zhu Yin, D. W. G. Sears, Scott A. Sandford, M. E. Zolensky, Alexander N. Krot, Leigh Blair, Darci J. Kane, J. A. Utas, R. S. Verish, J. M. Friedrich, Josh Wimpenny, Gary R. Eppich, K. Ziegler, Kenneth L. Verosub, Douglas J. Rowland, Jim Albers, Peter S. Gural, Bryant Grigsby, M. Fries, R. Matson, M. J. S. Johnston, Elizabeth A. Silber, Peter Brown, Akane Yamakawa, M. E. Sanborn, M. Laubenstein, K. C. Welten, K. Nishiizumi, M. M. M. Meier, H. Busemann, P. L. Clay, Marc W. Caffee, Philippe Schmitt‐Kopplin, Norbert Hertkorn, D. P. Glavin, Michael P. Callahan, Jason P. Dworkin, Qinghao Wu, Richard N. Zare, M. M. Grady, Sasha Verchovsky, V. V. Emel’yanenko, S. А. Naroenkov, David L. Clark, B. Girten, Peter S. Worden

Bibliographic record

VenueMeteoritics and Planetary Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsChondriteMeteoriteBrecciaGeologyMeteoroidAsteroidParent bodyRadiogenic nuclideGeochemistryOrdinary chondriteCrustAstrobiologyMantle (geology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Novato L6 chondrite fragmental breccia fell in California on 17 October 2012, and was recovered after the Cameras for Allsky Meteor Surveillance (CAMS) project determined the meteor's trajectory between 95 and 46 km altitude. The final fragmentation from 42 to 22 km altitude was exceptionally well documented by digital photographs. The first sample was recovered before rain hit the area. First results from a consortium study of the meteorite's characterization, cosmogenic and radiogenic nuclides, origin, and conditions of the fall are presented. Some meteorites did not retain fusion crust and show evidence of spallation. Before entry, the meteoroid was 35 ± 5 cm in diameter (mass 80 ± 35 kg) with a cosmic‐ray exposure age of 9 ± 1 Ma, if it had a one‐stage exposure history. A two‐stage exposure history is more likely, with lower shielding in the last few Ma. Thermoluminescence data suggest a collision event within the last ∼0.1 Ma. Novato probably belonged to the class of shocked L chondrites that have a common shock age of 470 Ma, based on the U,Th‐He age of 420 ± 220 Ma. The measured orbits of Novato, Jesenice, and Innisfree are consistent with a proposed origin of these shocked L chondrites in the Gefion asteroid family, perhaps directly via the 5:2 mean‐motion resonance with Jupiter. Novato experienced a stronger compaction than did other L6 chondrites of shock‐stage S4. Despite this, a freshly broken surface shows a wide range of organic compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeteoritics and Planetary ScienceSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207