MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spectral analysis techniques with Kalman filtering for estimating power quality indices

2010· article· en· W2073623624 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Zolfaghari, Y. Shrivastava, Vassilios G. Agelidis, Grace Chu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterComputer scienceElectronic engineeringSpectral densityTotal harmonic distortionRobustness (evolution)Distortion (music)Power factorWaveformVoltageDigital signal processingHarmonic analysisHarmonicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringBandwidth (computing)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the theory, design and implementation of two real time virtual instruments to measure the power quality indices such as current harmonic distortion, voltage harmonic distortion and power factor as given by the IEEE standard. Different windowing techniques are explored in the estimation of the spectra. Cross spectral analysis is used for the measurement of phase angles in voltage and current signal. The virtual instrument integrates digital signal processing (DSP) methods such as windowing techniques and Cross-spectral density estimation with Welch spectral estimation to calculate voltage and current phasors. Moreover a tunable Kalman filter with a forgetting factor is applied to further enhance the results due to noise in the measurement. Simulations followed by a real time experiment using a rectified AC waveform applied across an RL circuit is followed to support the theoretical claims and further to show the robustness of the virtual instruments. Finally the two instruments are compared with each other in terms of performance and speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207