MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073626716 · doi:10.5539/ass.v10n14p52

A Study on Corporate Image, Customer Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty in the Context of Retail Stores

2014· article· en· W2073626716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Selda Ene, Betül ÖZKAYA

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessLoyalty business modelMarketingCustomer satisfactionCustomer delightCustomer retentionAdvertisingService qualityCompetitive advantageLoyaltyContext (archaeology)Customer advocacyOrder (exchange)Corporate brandingBrand awarenessBrand managementService (business)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the intense competitive environment, in order for a retail store to gain strength and competitive edge, it needs to possess a strong corporate image and to keep and satisfy its customers. The retail store will create a successful brand loyalty due to its ability to be equipped with a strong corporate image and to increase customer satisfaction.Key elements that are effective in creating brand loyalty that enables the retail store to have a competitive edge, have an order of corporate image of the business, customer satisfaction, customer expectations, the product or the service quality that is perceived and perceived value. Setting from this point on, this study addresses corporate image and customer satisfaction elements that effect brand loyalty and surveys have been conducted with customers who shop from the retail stores in Istanbul and the relationship between customer satisfaction and brand loyalty is examined with regression analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207