Forms of cooperation in dyadic problem-solving
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous proposons un modele descriptif des formes de la resolution cooperante de problemes en dyade, avec les mecanismes d'apprentissage qui y sont associes. La resolution cooperante de problemes est analysee selon trois dimensions fondamentales et graduelles: la symetrie, l'alignement et l'accord. La premiere dimension renvoie a la distribution de roles transactionnels, la deuxieme a la coordination des actions, et la troisieme a la resolution de desaccords. La combinaison des trois dimensions produit un espace de huit formes principales de cooperation, au sein desquelles nous situons la collaboration. Des analyses comparatives de sequences d'interactions illustrent les relations entre les dimensions. Enfin, nous discutons des mecanismes d'apprentissage associes aux formes de cooperation, et nous proposons des extensions du modele pour analyser des groupes plus etendues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it