MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073686256 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v4n4p226

Co-Integration Study of Relationship between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth

2011· article· en· W2073686256 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haitao Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentGranger causalityEconomicsError correction modelCausality (physics)Gross domestic productChinaInternational economicsEconometricsMonetary economicsMacroeconomicsCointegration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on basic theories and methods of co-integration study, in this paper the author chooses data of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as samples and makes a co-integration study of relationship between FDI and economic growth. Granger Causality Test results show that China’s economic growth would inevitably cause a rise of FDI and the relationship tends to be a one-way causality. Error correction term has a stronger conversely-adjusted effect on the long-term equilibrium relationship between economic growth and FDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral DepositsFrench-language works237,207