MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073721355 · doi:10.1007/s12392-008-0052-8

Metis Wien – Supporting Good Governance

2008· article· de· W2073721355 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dieter Rehfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Politikberatung · 2008
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisCorporate governancePolitical scienceHumanitiesArtManagementComputer scienceWorld Wide WebEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metis ist ein europäisches Beratungsunternehmen, das in den Themen der europäischen Kohäsionspolitik interdisziplinär aktiv ist. Die Besonderheit ist, dass Metis den gesamten Politikzyklus von der Beratung und Analyse über die Programmformulierung bis zur Umsetzung und Evaluierung abdeckt. Zu den Leitbildern gehört eine Orientierung an den Grundsätzen von „Good Governance“ und an dem Gedanken der europäischen Kohäsion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für PolitikberatungSame topicCorporate Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207