Cellular Internalization of Poly(ethylene oxide)-<i>b</i>-poly(ε-caprolactone) Diblock Copolymer Micelles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PEO-b-PCL) block copolymers self-assemble into micelles in aqueous solution. We have examined whether these micelles can internalize into P19 cells in vitro. Fluorescently labeled PEO(45)-b-PCL(23) block copolymer was prepared by conjugating a tetramethylrhodamine molecule to the end of the hydrophobic PCL block. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies yielded 24 +/- 2 and 25 +/- 2 nm, respectively, for the diameters of the micelles. The studies also showed that chemical labeling did not effect the morphology or size. When the rhodamine-labeled PEO(45)-b-PCL(23) block copolymer micelles were tested in vitro, time-, concentration-, and pH-dependence of the internalization process suggested that internalization proceeded by endocytosis. The results from these studies provide the first direct evidence for the internalization of PEO(45)-b-PCL(23) micelles. Future studies will utilize multiple labeling of these micelles, allowing questions to be addressed related to the fate of internalized micelles as drug carriers, the destination of the incorporated drugs or fluorescent probes released from micelles, and the identification of the subcellular localization of the whole drug-carrier system within cells, both in vitro and in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".