MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073790377 · doi:10.1061/9780784413067.079

Life-Cycle Management - West Coast Deep Sea Wharf

2013· article· en· W2073790377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLife Cycle Costing Analysis
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWharfHarbourEngineeringCivil engineeringTransport engineeringComputer scienceMarine engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major export terminal in the Vancouver Harbour has five shipping berths, two of which consist of timber pile and deck construction with an asphalt overlay. The berths were originally constructed in 1959 and extended in 1965. Little to no maintenance was carried out at the berths until the mid-1990s, when an internal assessment raised questions about the condition of the facility. To better understand the situation, a comprehensive inspection of the facility was commissioned in 1996/1997. The inspection revealed widespread deterioration of the timber elements and alternatives to address the situation were investigated. Two alternatives were proposed: complete replacement of the facility and implementation of a phased maintenance program. This paper discusses the life cycle management (LCM) approach that was used to assess the two alternatives. A comparison between the costs of complete replacement and a phased maintenance program is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLife Cycle Costing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207