MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073806409 · doi:10.1159/000124906

Bovine ′Neurophysin II’ Stimulates Growth Hormone Release in the Estradiol-Primed Male Rat

2008· article· en· W2073806409 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Papas, Seon H. Shin, Marc C. Obonsawin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyRadioimmunoassayBasal (medicine)StimulationNeurophysinsHormoneChemistryPulsatile flowSomatropinGrowth hormoneBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basal plasma concentrations of growth hormone (GH) were monitored in both normal and estradiol-primed male rats by the collection of sequential blood samples from freely moving rats, via chronic intraatrial cannulae. Blood was sampled every 2 min for a period of 80 min and plasma GH levels determined by radioimmunoassay. The normal male rats displayed a pulsatile release of GH, while the estradiol-primed male rats exhibited a relatively steady level of plasma GH concentration. The rats exposed to high levels of estradiol (1.59 +/- 0.42 nmol/l plasma) also had a higher mean value of basal GH concentration. An injection of 100 micrograms/kg of bovine neurophysin II did not alter GH release in the normal male rats. However, it did significantly elevate GH levels in the estradiol-primed animals to a mean peak level approximately six times the mean basal level. The administration of 100 micrograms/kg of bovine neurophysin I to estradiol-primed male rats did not produce any change in plasma GH levels and thus eliminates the possibility of the nonspecific stimulation of neurophysin II on GH release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207