MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Russian-German Dictionary of Hunting and Related Fauna

2007· article· en· W2073856056 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert A. Orr

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanFaunaGeographyBiologyArchaeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's political and social climate, the title of the work being reviewed here Jagdworterbuch Russisch-Deutsch (hereafter JRD) may put off some readers. If so, this is a pity, as its author, Irmgard Lorenz, has put together a useful little compilation, with items which will undoubtedly pose a great deal of interest to a variety of readers and prove useful for elucidating obscure terms in literature and specialist texts (p. 9). Tsarist Russia, and subsequently the Soviet Union, used to cover one-sixth of the earth's land surface, stretching from the Arctic almost to the tropics. The wide variety of climatic zones and the terrain encompassed by them suggest that the lexicon related to hunting the local wildlife might be large enough for a dictionary. After all, Russian still serves as a lingua franca for most of the area of the former Soviet Union.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207