MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Throughput Physical-Layer Network Coding in Multi-Way Relay Channels with Binary Signaling

2012· article· en· W2073880248 on OpenAlexaff
Shaham Sharifian, Behnam Hashemitabar, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayLinear network codingComputer scienceBinary numberComputer networkThroughputNode (physics)Coding (social sciences)Relay channelChannel (broadcasting)Physical layerRouting (electronic design automation)AlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)WirelessMathematicsTelecommunicationsArithmeticNetwork packetEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of full data exchange in multi-way relay channels. It is shown that a throughput of \frac{1}{1.5N} symbol per node per channel use can be achieved using binary signaling, which is a 33% increase compared to plain routing. This is accomplished by providing common knowledge to all nodes and exploiting this knowledge to restrain some nodes from transmitting. The error performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated analytically. Results are presented which provide insights into multi-node network coding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207