Review of resistance factor for steel: data collection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in the Canadian steel industry warrant a review of the steel resistance factor in CSA Standard S16 (formerly S16.1) "Limit states design of steel structures", originally calibrated in the landmark study by Kennedy and Gad Aly in 1980. This paper summarizes data collected in 1999 and 2000 to determine statistical descriptions of geometric and material properties of rolled W, WWF, and HSS shapes that represent current steel production. Distinct sub-populations have been encountered within a single grade of WWF or HSS material. The geometric properties of rolled W, WWF, and HSS shapes produced to CSA Standard G40.20 have not significantly changed from the values reported by Kennedy and Gad Aly. The statistical parameters for yield strength have improved significantly for HSS shapes, improved slightly for WWF shapes, and worsened slightly for rolled W shapes. Complete summaries of the statistical data are presented. In a companion paper, these data are used to review the resistance factor for steel.Key words: code calibration, geometric properties, reliability, steel, tensile strength, yield strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.042 | 0.172 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.027 | 0.036 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".