Exciplex Fluorescence as a Diagnostic Probe of Structure in Coordination Polymers of Zn<sup>2+</sup> and 4,4‘-Bipyridine Containing Intercalated Pyrene and Enclathrated Aromatic Solvent Guests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coordination polymers based on Zn(II)-4,4'-bipyridine (Zn-bipy) frameworks containing pyrene intercalated between adjacent layers and aromatic solvent molecules enclathrated within the framework cavities have been prepared and characterized for the first time. These compounds are highly fluorescent, and show broad, featureless emission spectra significantly red-shifted relative to pyrene monomer fluorescence; this has been assigned to pyrene-bipy exciplex emission. Single-crystal X-ray structural analysis shows that the presence of the aromatic solvent molecule within the cavities has a profound effect on the architecture of these frameworks: in the case of benzene, toluene, p-xylene, and chlorobenzene, the Zn-bipy framework consists of 1-D ladders, whereas in the case of o-dichlorobenzene (the largest solvent guest), the framework was based on a 2-D square grid. This difference in stoichiometry and architecture was also reflected in significant differences in the fluorescence of these coordination polymers, with three of the four compounds with 1-D ladder geometries having similar fluorescence maxima (ca. 520 nm) and lifetimes (ca. 70 ns), whereas the compound with square grid topology had a significantly blue-shifted maximum (ca. 460 nm) and shorter lifetime (ca. 42 ns). It is proposed that exciplexes form upon excitation of ground-state complexes, involving face-to-face bipy/pyrene complexes (pi-pi stacking interactions) in the case of the 1-D ladder structures, but edge-to-face bipy/pyrene and pyrene/o-dichlorobenzene complexes (C-H...pi interactions) in the case of the 2-D square grid structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".