MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073945694 · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.7.073567

Leaf area index estimation in semiarid mixed grassland by considering both temporal and spatial variations

2013· article· en· W2073945694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Remote Sensing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLeaf area indexNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexGrasslandEnhanced vegetation indexEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingVegetation (pathology)Spatial variabilityAtmospheric sciencesMathematicsVegetation IndexGeographyStatisticsGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leaf area index (LAI) estimation in a mixed grassland ecosystem is limited by temporal and spatial variations controlled by land surface heterogeneity and ecological parameters. Therefore, simply estimated LAI usually has difficulty in meeting the requirements of the land surface–atmosphere interaction models. We estimated LAI based on the relationship between LAI and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by considering temporal and spatial variations. Spatial variations of both LAI and NDVI were investigated using the Morlet wavelet approach. Based on the ground reflectance data, LAI estimation can be greatly improved by taking temporal and spatial variations into account. The coefficient of determination (r 2 ) values of the LAI-NDVI equations were increased by 0.28, 0.51, and 0.44 in the early, maximum, and late growing seasons, respectively. LAI estimation from SPOT 4/5 and Landsat TM 5 images confirmed the applicability of the proposed estimation approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it