MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073953026 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2012.6425984

Mean field LQG games with mass behavior responsive to a major player

2012· article· en· W2073953026 on OpenAlexaff
Son Luu Nguyen, Minyi Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear-quadratic-Gaussian controlMean field theoryMinor (academic)Control theory (sociology)Nash equilibriumState (computer science)GaussianField (mathematics)Computer scienceOptimal controlCoupling (piping)Stochastic processMathematicsMathematical optimizationControl (management)Applied mathematicsAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) game with a major player and a large number of minor players with mean field coupling. The state of the major player appears in the dynamics of the minor players, causing the mean field to be responsive to its control. We construct decentralized ε-Nash strategies. This is accomplished by combining (i) stochastic control with random coefficients and (ii) a procedure called anticipative variational calculations which addresses the major player's ability to simultaneously perturb its own state process and the mean field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207