Prevention of subdural fluid collections following transcortical intraventricular and/or paraventricular procedures by using fibrin adhesive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Subdural fluid collections following transcortical intraventricular and/or paraventricular neurosurgical procedures for tumors are common and can be difficult to treat. The authors prospectively studied the efficacy of a fibrin adhesive (Tisseel) in closing cortical and ependymal defects following intraventricular and/or paraventricular lesion resection and in preventing the development of subdural fluid collections. METHODS: Twenty-five patients who underwent 29 transcortical approaches for the resection of intraventricular and/or paraventricular lesions were studied. No patient developed a symptomatic subdural fluid collection and no new seizure or progression of a preexisting seizure disorder was encountered during a median follow-up time of 29 months (range 1-57 months). The incidence of preoperative hydrocephalus was 72% and four (22%) of these patients required postoperative shunt placement. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a fibrin adhesive to seal cortical and ependymal defects after transcortical procedures appears to prevent the development of subdural fluid collections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".