MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073965196 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2010.535939

Mechanosorptive Creep of Hemlock under Conventional Drying: I. The Determination of Free Shrinkage Strain

2011· article· en· W2073965196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesCentral University Basic Research Fund of China
KeywordsShrinkageTsugaWestern HemlockCreepWater contentMaterials scienceMoistureComposite materialRelative humidityStrain (injury)AnisotropyHumidityThermodynamicsGeotechnical engineeringBotanyGeologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic free shrinkage behavior of Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) was investigated in order to provide the theoretical basis for the determination of drying mechanosoptive creep mechanism. Small specimens taken from five distinct positions within a log were dried at three constant temperatures (40, 60, and 80°C) and stepwise decreasing relative humidity conditions and their free shrinkage strain S in the tangential and radial directions was determined. The anisotropic shrinkage ratios G were also calculated and analyzed as functions of moisture content and temperature. The influential mechanism of the drying temperature, moisture range, and specimen position on the free shrinkage behavior was revealed. Two different function types were chosen to simulate the relationship between the free shrinkage strain and its variables (temperature, moisture, wood positions) for the specified moisture ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it