MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074028341 · doi:10.1109/4234.991150

On the planning of the S-PVC overlay in ATM networks

2002· article· en· W2074028341 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Chamberland

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivate Network-to-Network InterfaceAsynchronous Transfer ModeComputer scienceTabu searchPlannerComputer networkOverlayNetwork planning and designRouting (electronic design automation)HeuristicOverlay networkInteger programmingDistributed computingMathematical optimizationRouting protocolStatic routingAlgorithmThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tackle the planning problem of the soft-permanent virtual connections (S-PVCs) in asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) networks. The private network-to-network interface (PNNI) routing standard is used to route these connections. The planning problem consists of determining the PNNI link metrics and the capacity to reserve on each ATM link that ensure the successful rerouting of the S-PVCs for all failure scenarios of interest to the network planner. A mathematical programming model is proposed and a tabu search heuristic in order to find "good" solutions. Finally numerical results are presented and analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207