MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074030282 · doi:10.1002/num.20334

Mathematical modeling of boundary conditions for laser‐molecule time‐dependent Schrödinger equations and some aspects of their numerical computation—One‐dimensional case

2008· article· en· W2074030282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMontreal Clinical Research InstituteOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary value problemSpurious relationshipMathematicsComputationBoundary (topology)Excited stateWave functionDomain (mathematical analysis)Schrödinger equationMathematical analysisPartial differential equationBasis (linear algebra)Applied mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsGeometryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article deals with boundary conditions for time‐dependent Schrödinger equations for molecules excited by intense and ultrashort electric fields. On the basis of Volkov wavefunctions, we propose an original boundary condition design that allows to reduce spurious reflections at the domain boundary and allows to take at least partially, plasma effects into account. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq, 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it