MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cellular expression of the pepsinogen and gastric proton pump genes in the stomach of winter flounder as determined by <i>in situ</i> hybridization

2001· article· en· W2074045715 on OpenAlexaff
Anna K. Gawlicka, Cindy Leggiadro, Jeffrey W. Gallant, Susan E. Douglas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitute for Marine Biosciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoveolar cellBiologyPepsinGastric chief cellIn situ hybridizationGastric mucosaStomachMolecular biologySecretionEnteroendocrine cellProton pumpGastric acidGene expressionEnterochromaffin-like cellGeneInternal medicineATPaseBiochemistryEnzymeEndocrine systemHormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sites of pepsinogen synthesis and hydrochloric acid secretion were localized in the glandular stomach mucosa of winter flounder using in situ hybridization with gastric‐specific, biotinylated antisense RNA probes for three genes: pepsinogen IIa, pepsinogen IIb and the a‐subunit of the proton pump (H + /K + ‐ATPase). The spatial expression patterns of the pepsinogen IIa and IIb genes appeared to be the same, but they differed from that of the ‐proton pump gene. The gastric gland cells contained transcripts (mRNAs) of all three genes, whereas the mucous neck cells and surface mucous cells contained transcript of the a‐proton pump only. The expression of the pepsinogen IIa, pepsinogen IIb and α‐proton pump gene in the same gastric gland cells indicates that these cells synthesize pepsinogens and secrete hydrochloric acid simultaneously and confirms that they are of the oxynticopeptic type. The presence of the a‐proton pump mRNA in the mucous neck and surface mucous cells, shown here for the first time, indicates that these cells are capable of secreting hydrochloric acid. The physiological importance of hydrochloric acid secretion by these two cell types remains unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207