MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074090927 · doi:10.1680/macr.2000.52.4.297

Equipment for the analysis of the behaviour of concrete under restrained shrinkage at early ages

2000· article· en· W2074090927 on OpenAlexaff
M. Pigeon, Giancarlo Toma, Anik Delagrave, Benoı̂t Bissonnette, J. Marchand, J. C. Prince

Bibliographic record

VenueMagazine of Concrete Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Properties and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShrinkageStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)Stress relaxationSwellPosition (finance)Composite materialHead (geology)CreepMechanicsGeologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes an experimental set-up which was built to evaluate the visco-elastic deformations that can occur when a specimen of concrete is placed in a fully restrained condition from the time it is cast. It consists of two distinct devices. The first one allows the measurement of the free autogenous shrinkage from time t = 0. The second one, which includes a movable head, is used to determine the increase in load due to autogenous shrinkage, also from time t = 0. In both cases, the specimen is cast directly into the mould after mixing, and is then sealed. In the equipment with a movable head, the specimen is allowed to shrink (or swell) freely until it reaches a predetermined strain, at which time a sufficient force is applied to pull (or push) it back to its original position. It is then left again to shrink (or swell) while the force that is applied is maintained constant until the predetermined strain is once more reached, at which point the force is increased in order to pull (or push) it back to its original position. Such a procedure allows the determination of the stress build-up in the specimen as a function of time. It also allows the determination of the visco-elastic deformation (and thus of the stress relaxation) in the restrained shrinkage specimen by subtracting (at any given point in time) the cumulative sum of the strains in the restrained shrinkage specimen from the free shrinkage in the companion specimen. The results of a first series of tests on a mortar mixture are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagazine of Concrete ResearchSame topicConcrete Properties and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207