MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074090963 · doi:10.1061/9780784412848.231

Seismic Stability Response of Columns in Multi-Tiered Braced Steel Frames for Industrial Applications

2013· article· en· W2074090963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBracingStructural engineeringBraced frameBucklingFlexural strengthColumn (typography)Finite element methodStability (learning theory)BendingFrame (networking)Nonlinear systemComputer scienceEngineeringGeologyBracePhysicsConnection (principal bundle)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a study on the seismic response of multi-tiered, braced steel frames. The seismic demand and stability of the columns in a 4-tiered special X-braced frame structure located in a high seismic area and designed according to current AISC seismic provisions is evaluated. The drift demand in the individual bracing tiers and the combined column axial force and in-plane flexural demand are evaluated through nonlinear time history analysis. Detailed finite element analysis of one column under demands extracted from time history analysis is carried out to investigate the buckling response of the column. The results show that high in-plane bending demand is induced in the columns. Flexural yielding caused by non-uniform tier drift demand may detrimentally affect the torsional-flexural stability of the columns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it