Tandem Action of SNS–Cr and CGC–Ti in Preparation of Ethylene–1‐Hexene Copolymers from Ethylene Feedstock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ethylene–1‐hexene copolymer materials, ranging from semicrystalline linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) to completely amorphous polyethylenes (PEs), are prepared from ethylene alone in a single reactor by the tandem polymerization of bis(2‐dodecylsulfanyl‐ethyl)amine–CrCl3 (SNS–Cr) and (N‐tert‐butylamido) (tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)–titanium dichloride (CGC–Ti) at 75 °C and under atmospheric pressure. The polymerization activities are on the order of 105–106 g (mol Ti)−1 h−1. 1‐Hexene incorporation in the resulting copolymers can be adjusted by varying the Cr–Ti molar ratio and/or applying a short period of pre‐trimerization. Copolymers with high 1‐hexene incorporation up to 15 mol% are obtained. Few vinyl and vinylene chain ends are detected by 13C NMR, suggesting that 1‐hexene does not act as a chain‐transfer agent. Narrow molecular‐weight distributions with polydispersities from 1.9 to 2.6 are obtained, characteristic of a single‐active‐site nature of the catalyst system. image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".