MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074132290 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2014.6866605

Evaluation of an efficient Smart Grid communication system at the neighbor area level

2014· article· en· W2074132290 on OpenAlexafffund
Gowdemy Rajalingham, Quang‐Dung Ho, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScalabilitySmart gridNetwork packetWide area networkNetwork architectureLow latency (capital markets)InterconnectionLatency (audio)Distributed computingTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The successful implementation of Smart Grid (SG) requires an efficient communication infrastructure that is cost-effective, scalable and fault-tolerant. This paper aims to study and develop relevant networking techniques for an efficient and reliable SG Communication Network (SGCN). In particular, we propose a viable communication architecture for the interconnection of different radio access technologies along the separate segments of the SGCN. Specifically, WiFi mesh network at the Neighbor Area Network (NAN) level with LTE at the Wide Area Network (WAN) level. Based on this architecture, the performance, transmission latency and Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), of geographic routing in the NAN segment is considered. Specifically, the scaling of system performance when per-smart-meter data rate, channel shadowing level and the number of smart meters per collector increases is investigated. The results presented in this study can then serve as important guidelines for the design and development of relevant communication infrastructures for SGs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207