Alteration of Protein Constituents Induced by Low-Energy (<35 eV) Electrons: II. Dissociative Electron Attachment to Amino Acids Containing Cyclic Groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report measurements of the desorption of anions from thin condensed films of tryptophan (Trp), histidine (His) and proline (Pro) stimulated by 5-35 eV electron impact. H-, O-, OH- and CN- desorb from Trp, His and Pro, whereas CH2- is observed only from Pro fragmentation. Below 12 eV, the anion yield functions exhibit resonant structures indicative of dissociative electron attachment. For all three amino acids, this process is likely to be initiated by the resonant capture of the incident electron at the NH3(+)-CH-.....-COO- and/or NH2-CH-.....-COOH group of the molecule. Temporary electron attachment to the ring leads to anion desorption only for tryptophan and proline. The energy-averaged yields measured at the detector of the mass spectrometer are (4.9, 0.3 and 54.0) x 10(-8) H-/incident electron and (3.4, 2.9, 1.8) x 10(-11) O-/incident electron, respectively, from Trp, His and Pro dissociation. Fragmentation of amino acids is found to be as intense as that of the nucleic acid bases. These results are discussed within the context of radiobiological damage induced by secondary electrons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".