MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074257329 · doi:10.1080/02656730500069955

The role of heat shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp27 in cellular protection of the central nervous system

2005· review· en· W2074257329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hyperthermia · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHsp27Heat shock proteinHsp70BiologyCentral nervous systemNeuroscienceCell biologyNeuroprotectionSpinal cordGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat shock proteins (Hsps) are highly conserved and under physiological conditions act as molecular chaperones and/or have anti-apoptotic activities. Expression in the brain of two heat shock proteins, the70 kDa Hsp (Hsp70) and the 27 kDa Hsp (Hsp27), is notable because both proteins are highly inducible in glial cells and neurons following a wide range of noxious stimuli including ischemia, epileptic seizure and hyperthermia. In the central nervous system, constitutive expression of Hsp27 is limited to many (but not all) sensory and motor neurons of the brain stem and spinal cord, while there is little or no constitutive expression of Hsp70. However, inducible expression of both Hsp70 and Hsp27 is present in many areas of the brain and retina and is associated with cellular resistance to a variety of insults. The potential for manipulating the expression levels of Hsps for therapeutic advantage in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, stroke and glaucoma will be explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it