MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074332724 · doi:10.1115/1.4025789

Development of a Real-Time NOx Prediction Model Based on Heat Release Analysis in a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine

2013· article· en· W2074332724 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Wang, Chao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxDiesel engineAutomotive engineeringDiesel fuelCommon railCombustionExhaust gas recirculationWork (physics)Cold start (automotive)Environmental scienceCylinderAccelerationMechanicsInternal combustion engineMechanical engineeringEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A prediction model, which describes linear relationship between the nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions and the in-cylinder heat release rate in a direct-injection diesel engine, was developed through numerical simulations. A modified KIVA-3 V code was used to calculate NOx formations and to conduct heat release analyses in a direct-injection diesel engine under different operating conditions. The numerical simulation results indicated that the NOx formation amount was related to both the magnitude and the timing of the peak heat release rate in each engine cycle. Based on the above observations, a control-oriented dynamic NOx model was constructed and then implemented into a feedback emission control system on a small diesel engine. A new parameter—combustion acceleration—was proposed in this research to describe the intensity of the premixed combustion. Experimental work was also conducted to measure the real-time in-cylinder pressure at each crank-angle when the engine was running and the heat release rate was calculated instantaneously to control an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve. The experimental results showed that the proposed NOx prediction model was effective in controlling NOx emissions under high rpm conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207