Measuring Antiaromaticity by an Analysis of Ring Current and Coupling Constant changes in a Cyclopentadienone-Fused Dihydropyrene
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of the chloro- and parent cyclopentadienone-fused dihydropyrenes 10 and 7 are reported. Analysis of coupling constants, and chemical shift changes between these and the nonconjugated dihydro derivatives 11 and 8, and between the benzannulene 4 and the parent annulene 12, indicates without doubt that cyclopentadienone is behaving as an antiaromatic 4n-pi system and that in its effect on the ring current of 12, cyclopentanedienone has about 80% of the effect of benzene. This is the first time that a suitable probe has been used to estimate the relative ability of a 4n-pi system to bond localize the probe in comparison to the (4n + 2)-pi system benzene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it