MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074406683 · doi:10.2118/0512-0083-jpt

New Approach to Deepwater-Drilling-Data Analysis Enhances Real-Time Capabilities

2012· article· en· W2074406683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingReal-time dataVisualizationWellheadComputer scienceGeologyPetroleum engineeringEngineeringWorld Wide WebData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Editorial Manager Adam Wilson, contains highlights of paper SPE 146624, ’A New Approach to Deepwater Drilling Data Analysis Offers Enhanced Real Time Capabilities in a Post Macondo World,’ by John F. Greve, SPE, Chevron Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Business Unit, prepared for the 2011 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October-2 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Deepwater drilling activity in the Gulf of Mexico is no longer a given in the aftermath of the BP Macondo blowout. The new and ever-evolving process to apply for drilling permits and operate now greatly depends on thorough real-time monitoring of pertinent surface and downhole data. A new method for loading and analyzing live time and depth data showed merit during 2010 trials on two deepwater wells, one offshore eastern Canada and the other offshore west of the Shetland Islands. Rapid data access and standardized visualization of high-resolution time, depth, and survey data are vital to ensure that the occasional well-control event does not become today’s worldwide news headline. Background—Real-Time Data Collection The Wellbore Information Transfer Standard Markup Language (WITSML) well-data exchange protocol introduced in the mid-1990s continues to gain popularity as a standardized means to deliver drilling and logging data to the client operator. An increasing number of software programs are offering WITSML links to load depth-based data into programs for petrophysical analysis, pore-pressure estimation, and 3D visualization of well logs vs. seismic data. For roughly a decade, large service companies have offered Web-based viewing of drilling-gauge displays and real-time depth-based data. Even though Internet access to WITSML data has been available to client operators, little benefit has been derived from the time-based data because of inherent limitations of depth-focused Web-based viewers. A new vendor-neutral WITSML-based data viewer capable of easily connecting to multiple WITSML vendors combines real-time synchronous depth and time viewing of drilling, logging-while-drilling (LWD), and mud-logging data in a variety of graphical displays. Historical Perspective on Collection of Time-Based Drilling Data For many decades, time-based drilling data have been recorded with mechanical devices. Special 24-hour multiscale paper forms were loaded on a cylindrical drum every day. Because the chart was under a protective lid and sometimes covered by dirt and mud, it was considered more of a midnight chart-replacement chore for a roughneck than a useful tool. The charts rarely made it to the operator’s office and were often lost or thrown out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207