MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074430489 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2014.7039449

Stability of dynamical systems on a graph

2014· article· en· W2074430489 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Pirani, Thilan Costa, Shreyas Sundaram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjacency matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsTopology (electrical circuits)Scalar (mathematics)Graph energyMathematicsDynamical systems theoryExponential stabilityGraph theoryStability (learning theory)InterconnectionAdjacency listGraphLyapunov functionDiscrete mathematicsApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsComputer scienceLine graphVoltage graphAlgorithmCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the stability of large-scale discrete-time dynamical systems that are composed of interconnected subsystems. The stability of such systems is a function of both the dynamics and the interconnection topology. We investigate two notions of stability; the first is connective stability, where the overall system is stable in the sense of Lyapunov despite uncertainties and time-variations in the coupling strengths between subsystems. The second is the standard notion of asymptotic (Schur) stability of the overall system, assuming all interconnections are fixed at their nominal levels. We make connections to spectral graph theory, and specifically the spectra of signed adjacency matrices, to provide graph theoretic characterizations of the two kinds of stability for the case of homogeneous scalar subsystems. In the process, we derive bounds on the largest eigenvalue of signed adjacency matrices that are of independent interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207