A Near‐Infrared Photometric Study of the Low‐Latitude Globular Clusters Liller 1, Djorgovski 1, HP 1, and NGC 6528
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Images recorded through J , H , Ks ,2.2 μm continuum, and 2.3 μm CO filters are used to investigate the stellar contents of the low Galactic latitude globular clusters NGC 6528, Liller 1, Djorgovski 1, and HP 1, as well as surrounding bulge fields. Metallicities are estimated for the latter three clusters by comparing the colors and CO indexes of giant branch stars with those in other clusters and the bulge, while reddenings are estimated from the colors of bright bulge stars in the surrounding fields. In some cases the metallicities and reddenings are significantly different from previous estimates. The horizontal branch (HB) in NGC 6528 occurs at K = 13.2, and the K luminosity function of HB stars in this cluster is not significantly different from those in the moderately metal-rich clusters NGC 6304 and NGC 6316. R ', the ratio of HB to bright red giant branch (RGB) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, is 1.25 ± 0.25, in good agreement with its value in other globular clusters. The RGB bump in NGC 6528 is detected at K = 13.8, and the relative brightness of this feature with respect to the HB is consistent with the cluster being very metal rich. The HB in Liller 1 occurs at K = 14.4. Stars in Liller 1 have smaller J-K colors and CO indexes than bulge giants with the same brightness, and a comparison between the Liller 1 and NGC 6528 sequences on the ( K , J-K ), and ( K ,CO) color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) indicates that Liller 1 has a metallicity comparable to, and perhaps even slightly lower than, that of NGC 6528. Stars in Liller 1 and NGC 6528 occupy the same region of the ( J-H , H-K ) two-color diagram as bulge giants, which is consistent with these clusters forming as part of the bulge. Stars in Djorgovski 1 and HP 1 have significantly smaller CO indexes than stars with the same brightness in the surrounding bulge fields, and CMDs for these clusters are constructed by selecting objects according to CO index. After adjusting for differences in distance and reddening, the Djorgovski 1 giant branch on the ( K , J-K ) CMD is well matched by that of the [Fe/H] = -2.2 cluster M92, while the giant branch of HP 1 follows that of the [Fe/H] = -1.6 globular cluster M13. The metallicities inferred for both clusters are consistent with integrated J-K colors and CO indexes measured through moderately large (∼35''-45'') apertures. Based on the brightness of the RGB tip, it is concluded that Djorgovski 1 has a distance modulus μ 0 = 15.4, while the distance modulus of HP 1 is μ 0 = 14.7. The brightest stars in the fields surrounding Liller 1, Djorgovski 1, and HP 1 follow the same relation between M K and CO index as M giants in Baade's window. Stars as faint as the HB have been detected in the field surrounding HP 1, and the relative numbers of HB and upper giant branch stars indicate that R ' = 1.14 ± 0.11. This relatively low value reinforces earlier studies, which found that R ', and hence the helium abundance, likely does not vary with radius in the innermost regions of the Galactic bulge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".