MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074468333 · doi:10.7202/1007181ar

Les Missionnaires oblats et les cultures amérindiennes au 19e siècle

2011· article· fr· W2074468333 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Achiel Peelman

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente une analyse détaillée de la correspondance des missionnaires oblats en Orégon entre 1847 et 1956 et de son contexte historique. Les 246 lettres sélectionnées pour cette étude contiennent un nombre considérable d’observations d’ordre culturel, religieux et sociopolitique. Elles permettent de reconstruire la vision que ces missionnaires avaient de la réalité amérindienne au point de départ de leur aventure missionnaire. Cette vision est marquée par le contraste aigu entre une perception plutôt négative de la culture et de la spiritualité amérindienne et la solidarité des oblats avec les autochtones de l’Orégon dans la lutte pour leurs droits fondamentaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207