MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developing Behavioural Observation Scales to Foster Effective Entrepreneurship

2004· article· en· W2074468584 on OpenAlexaff
Travor C. Brown, Dennis Hanlon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipCoachingVariety (cybernetics)PsychologyInstrumentation (computer programming)Data collectionScale (ratio)Applied psychologySurvey instrumentMarketingBusinessComputer scienceSociologyFinanceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Effective entrepreneurship behaviours were developed empirically using survey data from 34 entrepreneurs. The data were then systematically collapsed into a 9-criterion, 47-item measurement instrument comprised of Behavioural Observation Scales (BOS; Latham and Wexley 1977). The resulting BOS now can be used in a variety of applications, including coaching and developing entrepreneurs, identifying the training needs of prospective entrepreneurs, and for evaluating the effectiveness of entrepreneurial training programs. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications for practice and a description of future research that can enhance the efficacy of the instrumentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Small Business & EntrepreneurshipSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207