Ligand-based molecular recognition and dioxygen splitting: an endo epoxide ending
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phosphido complex RuCp*(PPh2CH=CHPPh2)(PPh2) (1) was exposed to a number of small molecules and was found to recognize and activate molecular oxygen in an unprecedented fashion: the ruthenium species split O2 in a ligand-based 4-electron reduction to produce an endo epoxide, as well as a phosphinito ligand. Based on XRD data, VT NMR studies, cyclooctene trapping studies, and crossover experiments it was determined that the reaction proceeded through an intramolecular mechanism in which initial oxidation of the phosphido ligand generated an end-on peroxo intermediate. This mechanism was also supported by computational studies and electrochemical experiments. In contrast, an analogue of 1, RuCp*(Ph2P(ortho-C6H4)PPh2)(PPh2) (3), reacted in an intermolecular fashion to generate two phosphinito ligands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".