MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074478643 · doi:10.1159/000201205

Bronchial and Thymic Carcinoid Tumors: A Review

2009· review· en· W2074478643 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarcinoid tumorsCarcinoid syndromeNeuroendocrine tumorsAsymptomaticChemotherapyLymphPathologyPneumoniaLymphatic systemDiseaseRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchial carcinoid tumors are usually indolent, slow-growing tumors with an excellent prognosis. However, even typical carcinoids can metastasize to regional lymph nodes or to distant sites. Atypical carcinoids tend to behave more invasively with more frequent nodal and distant metastases. Despite this, long-term survival can be expected as many tumors grow and spread slowly. At the end of the spectrum are the highly aggressive small cell carcinomas which have a very poor prognosis despite aggressive chemotherapy. Clinically, carcinoid tumors are frequently asymptomatic. Symptoms are most frequently due to obstruction (pneumonia, 'asthma', coughing) or bleeding. Carcinoid syndrome is seen infrequently and usually signifies metastatic disease. Cushing's syndrome is occasionally seen in association with these tumors. The treatment of carcinoid tumors is surgical. Resection should be complete and encompass the regional lymph nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it