MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074480051 · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e328334ddcc

Action related sounds induce early and late modulations of motor cortex activity

2010· article· en· W2074480051 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Lepage, Sara Tremblay, Dang Khoa Nguyen, François Champoux, Maryse Lassonde, Hugo Théoret

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineHôpital Notre-DameUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceMotor cortexElectroencephalographyCortex (anatomy)PsychologyLateralization of brain functionPerceptionFunctional magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is now well established that the human brain is endowed with a mechanism that pairs action perception with its execution. This system has been extensively studied using visual stimuli and recent evidence suggests that it is also responsive to the sound of motor actions. Here, we presented action (finger and tongue clicks) and acoustically matched sounds to investigate action-related sound processing in a 12-year-old child undergoing intracranial monitoring of epileptic seizures. Electroencephalography grids were located over a large portion of the right hemisphere, including motor cortex. Wavelet analysis carried out on electrodes overlying the functionally defined hand representation of the motor cortex revealed early (100 ms) and late (250-450 ms) decreases in mu rhythm power (12 and 20 Hz) selective for natural finger-clicks compared with control sounds. These data suggest the presence of a rapid, multimodal resonance mechanism modulating motor cortex activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207