Lecture du débat sur les accommodements raisonnables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 26 mars 2007, le Qubec a t frapp par un vritable sisme lectoral, se retrouvant avec un gouvernement minoritaire pour la premire fois depuis plus d'un sicle, depuis 1878 plus prcisment. Il s'est galement dcouvert morcel en trois segments bien distincts, reprsent chacun l'Assemble nationale par une formation politique diffrente, ce qui a soulev des inquitudes chez bien des observateurs. La grande surprise a t la progression de l'ADQ (Action dmocratique du Qubec), une formation politique de droite considre jusque-l comme marginale et qui constitue aujourd'hui l'opposition officielle. Ce bouleversement est d en partie au dbat sur les accommodements raisonnables, qui a occup une grande place dans l'espace mdiatique et l'opinion publique au cours de la dernire anne, et la position claire de Mario Dumont sur la question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".