MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074497996 · doi:10.1115/gt2011-45390

Breakup of Liquid Jets Emerging From Elliptic Orifices

2011· article· en· W2074497996 on OpenAlexafffund
Ghobad Amini, Ali Dolatabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts A and B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBreakupBody orificeNozzleMechanicsInjectorCombustionJet (fluid)Entrainment (biomusicology)Air entrainmentMaterials scienceCombustion chamberPhysicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsChemistryEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive control can result in increasing fuel efficiency and reducing combustion instabilities of gas turbine spray combustors. Through the use of geometric modifications of the conventional circular nozzles, this method potentially enhances mixing which is responsible for entraining the bulk air necessary for combustion. Several studies show that elliptic jets have higher mass entrainment and spreading rate compared to the equivalent circular jets [1]. The majority of these works have been limited to gaseous jets. The present study focuses on a liquid spray discharging into still ambient air from a single-hole injector with elliptic cross-section. The primary breakup is investigated using a theoretical approach. Characteristics of elliptic orifice jet are compared with circular orifice jet under different breakup regimes and various nozzle geometries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts A and BSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207