MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074556311 · doi:10.1002/mus.10057

Effect of exercise on stability of chronically enlarged motor units

2002· article· en· W2074556311 on OpenAlexaff
Siu Lin Tam, V. Archibald, Neil Tyreman, Tessa Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenervationMedicineHindlimbMotor unitWeaknessEtiologyAnatomyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic denervation syndromes such as the post-polio syndrome are associated with progressive muscle weakness and fatigue after motoneuron death. Neither the etiology nor the management of these syndromes is clear. To address this issue, we partially denervated rat hindlimb muscles for 1 or 12 months and examined whether chronically enlarged motor units (MUs) become destabilized with time and further destabilized by daily running on exercise wheels. MU enlargement, measured electrophysiologically and morphologically was significantly reduced at 12 months in extensively denervated muscles, and to a lesser extent in moderately denervated muscles, as compared to the findings at 1 month. A 1-month period of running exercise further reduced the size of the chronically enlarged MUs in the extensively denervated muscles. We have therefore (1) successfully established a rat model of time-related MU size reduction, in which destabilization of chronically enlarged MUs results in loss of axonal terminals, and (2) demonstrated that nonphysiological activity has small but significant effects of further destabilizing the chronically enlarged MUs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuscle & NerveSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207