Automatic prostate boundary detection in ultrasound images using multiresolution deformable models and fuzzy logic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an automatic model based image segmentation system, where the instantiated model is refined incrementally using the domain knowledge combined by Fuzzy Logic. The Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) combines several different image features, which are used by experts to detect prostates in noisy ultrasound images. We use the Discrete Dynamic Contour (DDC) model because of its favorable performances in both open and closed contour models. The FIS governs the automatic open DDC model initialization and the following incremental growing process on a low-resolution image. At this stage, the initial open contour model grows by tracking the coarse edge details until it closes. The resulting closed contour model is then refined incrementally up to the original image resolution, incorporating finer edge details on to the model. The algorithm developed here is a general tool for object detection in an image analysis system, which employs a flexible framework designed to support multiple decision tools to collaborate in forming a solution. The FIS in our tool retrieves the domain knowledge it needs from the framework, to govern the model refinement process. The proposed algorithm can be used to detect the boundary of any object on an image, if the knowledge of the dominant image features is stored in the system. We have included results of the algorithm successfully applied to several ultrasound images to define the boundary of the prostate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".