MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metal-loaded liquid scintillators for neutrino experiments

2008· article· en· W2074574877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Yeh, Y. Williamson, R. L. Hahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrinoPhysicsSolar neutrinoScintillatorNuclear physicsNeutrino detectorNeutrino oscillationParticle physicsDetectorOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the first direct observation of neutrino flavor transformations at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, future planned neutrino experiments are focusing on the understanding of the neutrino oscillation mechanism by determining key neutrino parameters, such as the mass differences and mass hierarchy, the mixing angles, and the possibility of CP violation. Organic liquid scintillators (LS) have been the detection medium of choice for neutrinos since the early discovery experiment of Reines and Cowan. For the delayed neutron-capture signal following antineutrino capture, the advantages of adding a metallic element to the LS (to form M-LS) are significant. Chemically, there are challenges to adding inorganic salts of metal directly to the LS. Key aspects of the metal-loaded LS for neutrino detection are (a) long-term chemical stability, (b) high optical transparency, (c) high photon production by the LS, and (d) ultra-low impurity content, mainly of natural radioactive contaminants, such as U, Th, Ra, and Rn. The BNL Neutrino & Nuclear Chemistry group has a long history of neutrino research since Ray Davis's pioneering Homestake experiment. The group has developed new chemical techniques of loading metals, such as In, Yb, Gd, Nd, and currently Li and other low-Z elements, in organic liquid scintillator that can be used for low-energy solar neutrino, reactor antineutrino, terrestrial antineutrino or double-beta decay experiments. Metals at different concentrations in a series of liquid scintillators have been studied systematically at BNL. We have successfully prepared many metal-doped scintillators, with long attenuation lengths (10-15 m) and high light yields. These have been stable for long period of time since synthesis (>2 years for Gd-LS and Nd-LS, and >3 years for In-LS), a crucial characteristic in experiments that are planned to run for at least 3 years. Our chemical-doping technologies and the performance of different organometallic liquid scintillators for different experiments will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207