MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074575998 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.c364

CAST: An Online Tool for Facilitating Local Involvement in Watershed Implementation Plans for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load

2014· article· en· W2074575998 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olivia H. Devereux, Jessica R. Rigelman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsChesapeake bayWatershedEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringEstuaryOceanographyGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST) is an online nutrient and sediment load estimator to streamline and facilitate pollutant control plans consistent with the 2010 Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load (Bay TMDL).CAST simplifies the process for building scenarios and provides estimates of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment load reductions using best management practices.CAST uses the same data as was used to establish the Bay TMDL.Load reduction calculations are designed to allow rapid online scenario development while keeping the load estimations within 1% of the Watershed Model's urban loads.Because CAST is online and easy to use, local jurisdictions may deeply engage, thereby improving local management decisions and securing a higher likelihood of implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1350.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207