MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074577741 · doi:10.2118/97776-ms

Thermoplastic Properties of OCTG in a SAGD Application

2005· article· en· W2074577741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. Dall’Acqua, D. T. Smith, T. M. V. Kaiser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingYield (engineering)Petroleum engineeringQuality assuranceEngineeringQuality (philosophy)Mechanical engineeringProcess engineeringCivil engineeringManufacturing engineeringConstruction engineeringMaterials scienceOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Engineering studies demonstrate the significance of post-yield mechanical characteristics of Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) for governing the service limits of casing and liner products in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) operations. New test methodologies have been developed to characterize these post-yield properties in a thermal environment at field-representative strain rates and static strain conditions. This provides a basis for quality assurance programs to verify that materials used in well construction meet the requirements for post-yield service in thermal operations. This paper provides an overview of a quality program implemented for a major SAGD development in Western Canada. The program was designed to provide a statistically significant description of the thermo-mechanical properties of the tubulars used in the well construction. The overview includes a discussion of the material characterisation basis, the statistical design basis, a summary of material test results, and conclusions for ongoing testing in forthcoming phases of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207