Mutagenic probes of the role of Ser209 on the cavity shaping loop of human monoamine oxidase A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The available literature implicating human monoamine oxidase A (MAO A) in apoptotic processes reports levels of MAO A protein that do not correlate with activity, suggesting that unknown mechanisms may be involved in the regulation of catalytic function. Bioinformatic analysis suggests Ser209 as a possible phosphorylation site that may be relevant to catalytic function because it is adjacent to a six-residue loop termed the 'cavity shaping loop' from structural data. To probe the functional role of this site, MAO A Ser209Ala and Ser209Glu mutants were created and investigated. In its membrane-bound form, the MAO A Ser209Glu phosphorylation mimic exhibits catalytic and inhibitor binding properties similar to those of wild-type MAO A. Solubilization in detergent solution and purification of the Ser209Glu mutant results in considerable decreases in these functional parameters. By contrast, the MAO A Ser209Ala mutant exhibits similar catalytic properties to those of wild-type enzyme when purified. Compared to purified wild-type and Ser209Ala MAO A proteins, the Ser209Glu MAO A mutant shows significant differences in covalent flavin fluorescence yield, CD spectra and thermal stability. These structural differences in the purified MAO A Ser209Glu mutant are not exhibited in quantitative structure-activity relationship patterns using a series of para-substituted benzylamine analogs similar to the wild-type enzyme. These data suggest that Ser209 in MAO A does not appear to be the putative phosphorylation site for regulation of MAO A activity and demonstrate that the membrane environment plays a significant role in stabilizing the structure of MAO A and its mutant forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".