MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074629998 · doi:10.1109/bibmw.2010.5703769

Association network modeling from microarray data around fermentation stress response gene NSF1 (YPL230W) using significantly co-expressed gene set

2010· article· en· W2074629998 on OpenAlexaff
Kyrylo Bessonov, David Chiu, George van der Merwe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGeneMicroarray analysis techniquesBiologyMicroarrayGene expressionGene regulatory networkGeneticsGene clusterDNA microarrayCluster analysisFunction (biology)Computational biologyGene expression profilingComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NSF1 is one of the newly discovered fermentation stress response proteins that play a crucial role in the adaptation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to fermentation stress conditions. Using time course microarray gene expression profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (DBY7286) grown in YPD media, we identified and mapped genes significantly correlated to the NSF1 expression, hence producing a framework of analysis conditioned on the NSF1 gene function. From the analysis, we developed a novel approach using clustering on the correlated variable that constructed a core set of co-expressed genes. The result is an inter-associated gene network conditioned on the expressed NSF1 gene. The complete-link clustering algorithm grouped the NSF1 associated genes into functional clusters with a high degree correspondence to known metabolic pathways. Co-expressed genes to formed distinct functional chromosomal neighborhoods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207