MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074665132 · doi:10.1002/mren.201100079

The Integrated Deconvolution Estimation Model: Effect of Inter‐Laboratory <sup>13</sup>C NMR Analysis on IDEM Performance

2012· article· en· W2074665132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerEthyleneCarbon-13 NMRDeconvolutionOlefin fiberOlefin polymerizationReactivity (psychology)ChemistryEstimation theoryMaterials scienceCatalysisAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computer scienceOrganic chemistryAlgorithmPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The IDEM estimates the reactivity ratios of multiple‐site‐type catalysts used to make ethylene/ α ‐olefin copolymers. Analytical data from high‐temperature GPC and 13 C NMR are required in the estimation process. The CSLD information from the 13 C NMR is a crucial step in the estimation method due to NMR sensitivity and probe efficiency. The effect of inter‐laboratory analysis on IDEM parameter estimation and model predictions is studied. The copolymer samples are analyzed at the University of Waterloo and Dow Chemical Research Center at Freeport, Texas without standardization. The results prove that the IDEM is a robust parameter estimation model for ethylene/ α ‐olefin copolymers made with multiple‐site‐type catalysts, even when the copolymer samples are analyzed in different laboratories. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it