Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au début des années 1970, le gouvernement québécois intervint de façon massive afin de réformer le financement, l'organisation et l'administration des services de santé, en fonction de grands objectifs socio-démocratiques. Bien que le programme d'assurance-maladie eut un impact redistributif important, les autres aspects de la réforme n'apportèrent au public guère plus que des bénéfices symboliques, camouflant ainsi le véritable partage des bénéfices entre divers groupes d'élites. Replaçant cette situation dans le contexte des autres réformes de la Révolution tranquille et la comparant à la situation ontarienne, l'auteur souligne le caractère idiosyncratique des stratégies québécoises de réforme et leur incapacité d'atteindre les idéaux mis de l'avant. Il suggère que ces phénomènes renvoient aux caractéristiques propres aux rapports entre les classes sociales au Québec et à l'existence de contraintes structurelles encadrant les interventions de l'État dans une société capitaliste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".