MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrodeposition of composite polypyrrole–carbon nanotube films

2011· article· en· W2074666751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolypyrroleMaterials scienceCarbon nanotubeComposite numberComposite materialComposite filmNanotechnologyNanotubeCarbon fibersPolymerPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polypyrrole (PPY) films were electrochemically deposited on stainless steel substrates from aqueous pyrrole solutions containing p-toluene sulphonic acid and 4,5-dihydroxy-1,3-benzenedisulphonic acid disodium salt (tiron). The deposition potential of PPY in the solutions containing tiron was 0·2 V lower than that in the solutions containing p-toluene sulphonic acid. It was found that tiron can be used for the dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and fabrication of composite PPY–MWCNT films. The deposition yield was studied under galvanostatic conditions. The mechanism of PPY–MWCNTs deposition in the presence of tiron was discussed. The incorporation of MWCNTs into the PPY during electropolymerisation resulted in the formation of porous films. The films were investigated for the application in electrodes of electrochemical supercapacitors. Cyclic voltammetry data for the films tested in the 0·5M Na 2 SO 4 solutions showed a capacitive behaviour in a voltage window of −0·5 to +0·4 V versus a saturated calomel electrode. The composite PPY–MWCNT films showed improved capacitive behaviour and lower electrical resistance compared to the pure PPY films. A highest specific capacitance (SC) of 310 F g −1 was obtained at a scan rate of 2 mV s −1 for the composite films. The SC decreased with an increasing film thickness and scan rate. The cycling stability of the films was investigated. The results indicated that the PPY–MWCNT films deposited on the stainless steel substrates are promising electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it